Google Search Results

Anyone who knows anything about SEO (Search Engine Optimization) knows that Google's search results are anything but random. In fact, Google's search results are far from random.

Now, Google would love for you to believe that its search results represent the most relevant pages to the search term that you enter. The truth, however, is that Google's search results return more often than not the pages that either are from paid sponsors or are pages that are so irrelevant that the paid sponsor's site looks as though it is the only relevant page(s). Simple tests will prove this.

If you would like to know how "accurate" Google's search results are then simply search for this blog using Google's Blog search. At the time that I posted this blog I conducted three searches using the Blog engine to find this blog. My first search used the term "The Rex Factor" and returned several results however none were for this blog. My second attempt was designed to narrow the search results by entering "The Rex Factor""Obama" (the quotation marks tell the search engine to look for the exact term within the quotation marks) and again there were several results but none for this blog. Next, I used the "control" search entering the terms "The Rex Factor""Obama""Emperor Haile Selassie" knowing that the probability that these exact search terms would most likely not be found in another blog other than my own. The result was the famous, "Your search - 'The Rex Factor''Obama''Emperor Haile Selassie' - did not match any documents."

Now, I find it hard to believe that Google's search results are at all accurate when Google's search engine can't even find results for Blogs using its own service. I mean, how can that be? Are we expected to believe that Google can produce results from all over the world and from the millions of web sites that are out there in a objective way yet it can't even find a blog on its own service that has been up for a reasonably long time? No, we can not.

Google's search results are not objective. Google's result are anything but objective. Google returns results for the highest bidders, and then subverts the results of other "non-paying" sites. This should come as no surprise, after all Google is based out of the greater San Francisco Bay Area, and we all know that nothing but fascist and communist come out of the Bay Area.

Why Such A Push Now For Health Care Reform?

Democrats tried to downplay the losses they suffered this week in the special elections trying to dismiss them as meaningless. So, why is there such a push now for Health Care Reform to go to a vote? Democrats had been postponing the vote because they knew their constituents were unhappy about the legislation. Now, after having seen the aftermath of the Democrat party's indifference to their constituents we now see a strong push by the legislature to pass the Health Care Reform bill through Congress.

I contend that the reason for this is that the Democrats know their backs are up against the wall. Those who didn't know who they really were now realize the truth. In my opinion, this new "sense of urgency" is the result of one of two things. Either it is a realization by the Democrat Party that their constituents are beginning to wake up to their far-left agenda and the communist underpinnings of it and they know that if it is not passed now they may not get the chance, or, they actually believe, in their ignorance, that the bill will help their popularity. The latter is less likely though since the bill will not take effect until 2013 - conveniently after Obama will be running for re-election.

Either way, the political strategy behind the vote on Health Care Reform is, in my opinion, motivated by desperation.

I don't know exactly what it is but I can never seem to trust a Democratic president. I have a hard enough time trusting politicians in general, but I really have a hard time trusting a presidents that are Democrats. I think it comes from the fact that the only liberal presidents I have really been exposed to are Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.

The reason I think I had such a hard time trusting Bill Clinton was not only because of the Monica Lewinsky deal, but it all started with his campaign. I remember Bill Clinton campaigning on MTV playing the saxophone and wearing his cheesy sunglasses. It was all such a put on. I remember thinking, "have politicians no shame?" Clinton's campaign only brought to the forefront the levels some are willing to sink to further their political ambitions. Now, this is not a monopoly held by Democrats by any means but Bill Clinton brought it to the forefront, in all it's cablecast glory, with his little campaign stunt on MTV. During the Monica Lewinsky trial when he tried to dance around the definition of sexual relations it only solidified, at least for me anyway, the bold face liar that he was and that nothing...not even the sanctity of the truth was enough to keep him from selling his soul to save his political career.

Now, with Barack Obama in office we see the exact same thing. From the campaign trail to the campaigns for legislation Barack Obama is selling his cart of shit to the American public. Lucky for America, no one is buying it anymore. I remember listening to his campaign and thinking as he spoke, "there is no way this guy is going to be elected...the American people are not that stupid." When Obama actually was elected I was stunned but only long enough to really put things into perspective. Before I continue let me clarify.

Obama is a novelty president. Obama was elected in most part simply for the fact that he was African-American (anyone who says he was elected because he was qualified for the job or actually bought into the rhetoric he was spouting along the campaign trail is quite simply a moron). I think that a great deal of African-Americans, and America possibly, needed the "first black president" as everyone was so quick to point out. However, I think that by designating Obama as the "first black president" America simply perpetuates stereotypes and any perceived need they felt was fulfilled by electing Obama on such a premise is doomed to do more damage to overcoming such stereotypes than it will do good. Why must Obama be deemed a "black" president? Why wasn't he simply the next president of the United States? When I think of "black" preceeding...well anything...I think of the words of Emperor Haile Selassie I which Bob Marley put into the song "War." They are:

Until the philosophy which holds one race superior and another inferior
Is finally and permanently discredited and abandoned
That until there are no longer first and second class citizens
Of any nation
Until the color of a man's skin
Is of no more significance than the color of his eyes
That until the basic human rights are equally guaranteed to all
Without regard to race
That until that day, the dream of lasting peace
World citizenship, and the rule of international morality
Will remain but a fleeting illusion to be pursued
But never obtained

Obama, to me is not a "black" president. He is simply a president, and to reduce the office of the president of the United States to an office that can be won through novelty campaigns centered on race, gender, or some other kind of novelty, then the campaign tactics of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama seem to be the new strategy of Democrats.

This, I would say, is by far the biggest reason I don't trust Democrat presidents because Democrat candidates have proven that the end justifies the means and that the end game is quite simply pushing their agenda by whatever means necessary. To Democrats nothing is sacred...not even the presidency itself. Therefore, the presidency must not be the goal. The goal is therefore, must be power.

The Obama campaign spouted a host of lies that were delivered with a straight face, and what some would call charm, when all the while everyone, including the candidates spouting the lies, knew was a bunch of hot air. So, how was Obama elected? He wasn't at all qualified...his actions as president have proven that. He didn't have sound policies...his actions as president have proven that. He wasn't believable in his promises...his actions as president have proven that. So, how did he get elected? Well, I think I've already told you.

Democrat presidents, however, are not the only disliked presidents by any means. In fact, president George W. Bush and George Bush Sr. were disliked as presidents by both democrats and republicans alike. But I don't think that George W. Bush ever lied about things that he believed in. I don't think he followed through on a lot of things but I also think that it was largely in part to the fact that during his second term, the time that most would point to as his most unpopular time, was due in large part to the fact that Democrats overtook the republican majorities in the house and the senate in 2006 and he was unable to negotiate bipartisan deals on the issues that would have solidified the conservative base...and the conservative democrats as well...immigration reform. Instead, the Democrats realizing that they had a real chance to gain power in the nest presidential election since they had strong "novelty" candidates in Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama bided their time in order to win the super majority that they now hold. So, the 2008 election came down to which novelty president the Democratic party would run and it ended up, so it seems, that an African-American president was a more likely win for the Democrats than a woman president despite the fact the Hillary Clinton was far more qualified for the job the Obama. Clinton, however, was positioned for a second run on the presidency when she was offered a cabinet position following Obama being elected president. This is the Democrat parties strategy for the next election...run another novelty president, win the election base on novelty and fulfill the democratic agenda...socialism!!!

The democrat party's approach to the presidency, the end justifies the means, is clear. The campaigns and the candidates are all the proof one needs. The actions of these candidates once elected only serve as supporting evidence to this fact. Now, it does not matter to me whether a candidate or president is republican or democrat so long as they treat the office of the president with the respect it deserves and unfortunately the democrats in the recent past have made a mockery of the position and it is completely unacceptable.